Green_Lyydia
Newbie Streaker
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2026
- Messages
- 3
I recently came across a case involving a Gamba.com player whose account was permanently suspended, leaving their entire **$3,401 balance** inaccessible.
From what the player explained, Gamba initially accused them of “sports abuse.” However, the casino later changed its explanation to “multi-account sports abuse,” alleging that the player was connected to a betting syndicate involving more than five other accounts.
The player disputed the accusation, explaining that they had only ever created and used one Gamba account. They denied operating multiple accounts or participating in any betting syndicate.
Wanting to understand the situation, the player repeatedly contacted support and requested evidence showing how their account was connected to the alleged group. They also asked Gamba to identify the specific rules they had supposedly violated and explain why the casino believed it had the right to confiscate their entire balance.
Unfortunately, according to the player, those requests did not produce any concrete evidence. Support reportedly maintained that the decision had already been made and would not be reconsidered.
There was another troubling aspect to the case. The player claims Gamba admitted that deposits would ordinarily be refundable but decided to withhold those funds as well because of the alleged syndicate activity.
With the account permanently banned, the player naturally tried to withdraw the remaining money. However, the platform displayed a message stating that the USDT wallet was temporarily locked. Surprisingly, access to casino slot games reportedly remained available despite the permanent ban.
After several unsuccessful attempts to get answers, the player submitted a formal written complaint to Gamba. They say they have preserved the relevant evidence, including support conversations, account balance screenshots, transaction records, betting history, and casino activity.
The player is now seeking the return of the full **$3,401** and wants Gamba to provide verifiable evidence if it continues to stand by its allegations.
**Evidence Provided:**
https://imgur.com/a/mX3Ioew
**Original Complaint Thread:**
https://lcb.org/onlinecasinobonusforum/player-complaints/gamba-com-confiscated-my-full-3-401-balance-after-alleging-5-linked-accounts
This dispute raises questions that deserve clear answers. Gamba should explain the basis for its accusations and why the player's entire balance was confiscated. Until then, the player remains without access to the $3,401 and is still seeking a fair resolution.
We will share any meaningful updates if the situation changes.
From what the player explained, Gamba initially accused them of “sports abuse.” However, the casino later changed its explanation to “multi-account sports abuse,” alleging that the player was connected to a betting syndicate involving more than five other accounts.
The player disputed the accusation, explaining that they had only ever created and used one Gamba account. They denied operating multiple accounts or participating in any betting syndicate.
Wanting to understand the situation, the player repeatedly contacted support and requested evidence showing how their account was connected to the alleged group. They also asked Gamba to identify the specific rules they had supposedly violated and explain why the casino believed it had the right to confiscate their entire balance.
Unfortunately, according to the player, those requests did not produce any concrete evidence. Support reportedly maintained that the decision had already been made and would not be reconsidered.
There was another troubling aspect to the case. The player claims Gamba admitted that deposits would ordinarily be refundable but decided to withhold those funds as well because of the alleged syndicate activity.
With the account permanently banned, the player naturally tried to withdraw the remaining money. However, the platform displayed a message stating that the USDT wallet was temporarily locked. Surprisingly, access to casino slot games reportedly remained available despite the permanent ban.
After several unsuccessful attempts to get answers, the player submitted a formal written complaint to Gamba. They say they have preserved the relevant evidence, including support conversations, account balance screenshots, transaction records, betting history, and casino activity.
The player is now seeking the return of the full **$3,401** and wants Gamba to provide verifiable evidence if it continues to stand by its allegations.
**Evidence Provided:**
https://imgur.com/a/mX3Ioew
**Original Complaint Thread:**
https://lcb.org/onlinecasinobonusforum/player-complaints/gamba-com-confiscated-my-full-3-401-balance-after-alleging-5-linked-accounts
This dispute raises questions that deserve clear answers. Gamba should explain the basis for its accusations and why the player's entire balance was confiscated. Until then, the player remains without access to the $3,401 and is still seeking a fair resolution.
We will share any meaningful updates if the situation changes.
